Income distribution:Indian Economic Service

FOR SOLVED PREVIOUS PAPERS OF INDIAN ECONOMIC SERVICE KINDLY CONTACT US ON OUR WHATSAPP NUMBER 9009368238

FOR SOLVED PREVIOUS PAPERS OF ISS KINDLY CONTACT US ON OUR WHATSAPP NUMBER 9009368238

FOR BOOK CATALOGUE 
CLICK ON WHATSAPP CATALOGUE LINK https://wa.me/c/919009368238

Income Distribution – Concepts, Theories, and Measures

1. Introduction

📌 Income distribution refers to how income is shared among individuals or groups within an economy.
📌 It plays a critical role in economic growth, social stability, and policy-making.
📌 Economists analyze income distribution to understand inequality, poverty, and wealth concentration.

Example: In a country where the top 10% earn 50% of the total income, income distribution is highly unequal.


2. Types of Income Distribution

🔹 (1) Functional Distribution of Income

✔ Focuses on how income is divided among factors of production (land, labor, capital).
Key Question: How much of national income goes to wages, rents, and profits?

Example: In a capitalist economy, capital owners may receive a larger share than workers.


🔹 (2) Personal Distribution of Income

✔ Examines how income is distributed among individuals or households.
Key Question: What percentage of people earn high, middle, or low income?

Example: The Gini coefficient measures personal income inequality (0 = perfect equality, 1 = extreme inequality).


🔹 (3) Regional Income Distribution

✔ Studies income variations across different regions within a country.
Key Question: Why do some regions have higher average income than others?

Example: Rural areas often have lower income than urban areas due to fewer economic opportunities.


3. Theories of Income Distribution

🔹 (1) Classical Theories (Ricardo, Marx, Malthus)

Ricardo: Landowners benefit the most due to scarcity of land.
Marx: Capitalism leads to exploitation of workers, causing income inequality.
Malthus: Population growth affects wage levels and income distribution.


🔹 (2) Marginal Productivity Theory (Neoclassical View)

✔ Suggests that income distribution depends on the marginal productivity of factors.
✔ Workers earn wages equal to their contribution to output.
Criticism: It does not explain power dynamics and wage disparities.

Example: A highly skilled programmer earns more than a factory worker due to higher productivity.


🔹 (3) Keynesian and Post-Keynesian Views

Keynes: Government policies (taxes, subsidies) influence income distribution.
Kaldor: Saving behavior differs between workers and capitalists, affecting income inequality.

Example: Taxing the rich and redistributing income through social programs can reduce inequality.


🔹 (4) Kuznets Hypothesis

✔ Suggests that inequality first increases, then decreases as economies develop.
“Inverted U-shaped Curve”:

  • Early Stage: Economic growth benefits the rich.
  • Later Stage: Wealth spreads, reducing inequality.

Criticism: Some countries experience persistent inequality even at high development levels.


4. Measuring Income Distribution

🔹 (1) Gini Coefficient

✔ Ranges from 0 (perfect equality) to 1 (extreme inequality).
Higher Gini = More inequality.
Example:

  • Sweden (low inequality) → Gini = 0.25
  • South Africa (high inequality) → Gini = 0.63

🔹 (2) Lorenz Curve

✔ Graph showing the proportion of income held by different population segments.
✔ The further from the 45° line, the greater the inequality.


🔹 (3) Income Share Ratios

✔ Compares income of top vs. bottom percentiles.
Example:

  • Top 10% earn 50% of total income.
  • Bottom 50% earn only 10%High inequality.

🔹 (4) Theil Index & Atkinson Index

✔ Advanced measures that account for different inequality sensitivities.


5. Causes of Income Inequality

Differences in Education & Skills → Higher skills = Higher wages.
Technological Change → Automation benefits highly skilled workers.
Globalization → Outsourcing and trade affect wage distribution.
Tax Policies → Low taxes on the rich can increase inequality.
Discrimination → Gender and racial wage gaps contribute to inequality.


6. Policies to Address Income Inequality

Progressive Taxation → Higher taxes on the wealthy.
Minimum Wage Laws → Increases earnings of low-income workers.
Universal Basic Income (UBI) → Provides a minimum income for all.
Public Services (Healthcare & Education) → Improves equal opportunities.

Example: Scandinavian countries have high taxes but low inequality due to social welfare programs.


7. Conclusion

✔ Income distribution is crucial for economic stability and social equity.
✔ Inequality can be reduced through progressive taxation, education, and social policies.
✔ A balanced approach between market efficiency and fairness is essential.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *