Income distribution:Indian Economic Service

FOR SOLVED PREVIOUS PAPERS OF INDIAN ECONOMIC SERVICE KINDLY CONTACT US ON OUR WHATSAPP NUMBER 9009368238

FOR SOLVED PREVIOUS PAPERS OF ISS KINDLY CONTACT US ON OUR WHATSAPP NUMBER 9009368238

FOR BOOK CATALOGUEΒ 
CLICK ON WHATSAPP CATALOGUE LINKΒ https://wa.me/c/919009368238

Income Distribution – Concepts, Theories, and Measurement

1. Introduction

πŸ“Œ Income distribution refers to how a nation’s total income is divided among its population.
πŸ“Œ It is a key indicator of economic inequality and social welfare.
πŸ“Œ Unequal income distribution can lead to economic instability, poverty, and policy interventions.

βœ” Example: In the USA, the top 1% of earners hold a disproportionate share of wealth compared to the bottom 50%.


2. Measures of Income Distribution

πŸ”Ή (1) Lorenz Curve

βœ” A graphical representation of income inequality.
βœ” The x-axis represents cumulative population percentage (poorest to richest).
βœ” The y-axis represents cumulative income percentage.
βœ” The further the Lorenz curve is from the 45-degree line of equality, the greater the inequality.

πŸ“Œ Example Interpretation:

  • If 10% of the population earns 10% of income, 20% earns 20%, and so on β†’ Perfect equality.
  • If 10% of the population earns 2% of income, and 90% earns 98% β†’ High inequality.

πŸ”Ή (2) Gini Coefficient

βœ” A numerical measure derived from the Lorenz Curve.
βœ” Ranges from 0 to 1:

  • 0 β†’ Perfect equality (everyone earns the same).
  • 1 β†’ Perfect inequality (one person earns all income).

πŸ“Œ Example Gini Index for Countries (2024 Estimates):

  • Norway: 0.27 (low inequality)
  • USA: 0.41 (moderate inequality)
  • South Africa: 0.63 (high inequality)

πŸ”Ή (3) Kuznets Curve Hypothesis

βœ” Developed by Simon Kuznets (1955).
βœ” Suggests income inequality first increases during industrialization, then decreases as economies develop.
βœ” Shaped like an inverted U.

πŸ“Œ Example:

  • Agrarian economies (low inequality).
  • Industrializing economies (high inequality as wealth accumulates in urban areas).
  • Developed economies (inequality falls due to social policies).

πŸ”Ή (4) Theil Index & Atkinson Index

βœ” Theil Index: Measures income inequality using entropy-based calculations.
βœ” Atkinson Index: Adjusts for social welfare by emphasizing low-income groups.

πŸ“Œ Used for international comparisons and tracking inequality trends.


3. Theories of Income Distribution

πŸ”Ή (1) Classical Theory (Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Karl Marx)

βœ” Smith: Income depends on labor productivity.
βœ” Ricardo: Income distribution is determined by land, labor, and capital.
βœ” Marx: Capitalist societies lead to exploitation of labor, increasing inequality.


πŸ”Ή (2) Neoclassical Theory (Marginal Productivity Theory)

βœ” Each factor of production (labor, capital) is paid according to its marginal contribution.
βœ” Perfect competition ensures fair income distribution.
βœ” Criticism: Fails to explain real-world income disparities (e.g., inherited wealth).


πŸ”Ή (3) Keynesian Theory

βœ” Government intervention (taxation, social spending) can reduce inequality.
βœ” Emphasizes aggregate demand and welfare policies for equitable distribution.


πŸ”Ή (4) Modern Approaches (Piketty, Sen, Stiglitz)

βœ” Thomas Piketty (2014): Capital accumulation widens inequality (r > g, return on capital exceeds economic growth).
βœ” Amartya Sen: Focuses on capabilities approach, ensuring fair access to education and healthcare.
βœ” Joseph Stiglitz: Emphasizes the role of market failures and financialization in rising inequality.


4. Factors Affecting Income Distribution

βœ” Economic Growth β†’ Can reduce or increase inequality.
βœ” Education & Skills β†’ Higher education leads to higher wages.
βœ” Technological Change β†’ AI & automation replace low-skill jobs.
βœ” Globalization β†’ Outsourcing and trade impact wage structures.
βœ” Taxation & Government Policies β†’ Progressive taxation redistributes wealth.
βœ” Demographics & Social Mobility β†’ Age, race, gender impact income levels.


5. Policy Measures to Address Income Inequality

βœ” Progressive Taxation β†’ Higher income groups pay a larger tax share.
βœ” Minimum Wage Laws β†’ Ensures fair compensation for low-income workers.
βœ” Universal Basic Income (UBI) β†’ Direct cash transfers to reduce poverty.
βœ” Education & Training Programs β†’ Equal access to skill development.
βœ” Wealth Redistribution β†’ Inheritance tax, social security, and welfare schemes.

πŸ“Œ Example Policies:

  • Nordic Model (Sweden, Norway) β†’ High taxes, strong welfare.
  • U.S. Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) β†’ Helps low-income workers.
  • China’s Rural Reforms β†’ Reduced poverty through agricultural development.

6. Conclusion

βœ” Income distribution affects economic stability, social mobility, and growth.
βœ” Gini coefficient & Lorenz curve are key measures of inequality.
βœ” Kuznets Curve suggests inequality rises, then falls with development.
βœ” Government policies play a crucial role in ensuring equitable income distribution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *