including Coase and Sen :Indian Economic Service

FOR SOLVED PREVIOUS PAPERS OF INDIAN ECONOMIC SERVICE KINDLY CONTACT US ON OUR WHATSAPP NUMBER 9009368238

FOR SOLVED PREVIOUS PAPERS OF ISS KINDLY CONTACT US ON OUR WHATSAPP NUMBER 9009368238

FOR BOOK CATALOGUEΒ 
CLICK ON WHATSAPP CATALOGUE LINKΒ https://wa.me/c/919009368238

Including Coase and Sen

1. Introduction

Social choice theory and recent schools of economic thought focus on how societies make collective decisions, allocate resources, and address inefficiencies. This field has been significantly shaped by economists like Kenneth Arrow, Amartya Sen, and Ronald Coase, whose work explores decision-making, welfare, and institutions.

This article covers:
βœ” Social choice theory (Arrow’s Theorem, Sen’s Contributions)
βœ” Coase’s Theorem and the role of institutions
βœ” Recent economic schools (Behavioral, Complexity, Institutional Economics)


2. Social Choice Theory

πŸ”Ή (1) Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem

Kenneth Arrow’s theorem states that no voting system can fairly aggregate individual preferences into a collective decision while satisfying these criteria:

βœ” Pareto efficiency – If all individuals prefer A to B, society should also prefer A to B.
βœ” Non-dictatorship – No single individual should determine the group’s decision.
βœ” Independence of irrelevant alternatives – Adding a third option shouldn’t change the ranking of existing choices.

πŸ“Œ Example:

  • In elections, ranked voting may fail because removing one candidate can change the outcome unpredictably.

βœ” Implication: Perfect fairness in collective decision-making is impossible.


πŸ”Ή (2) Amartya Sen’s Contributions

Sen expanded Arrow’s work to focus on welfare economics, inequality, and freedoms.

βœ” Capability Approach – Economic policies should enhance people’s freedoms and well-being, not just GDP.
βœ” Interpersonal Comparisons – Unlike Arrow, Sen argued that comparing people’s well-being is necessary for fairness.
βœ” Social Justice & Poverty – He developed indices like the Human Development Index (HDI).

πŸ“Œ Example:

  • A country with high GDP but poor healthcare and education is not truly developed.

βœ” Policy Implication:

  • Development policies should focus on health, education, and empowerment.

3. Coase’s Theorem and Institutional Economics

πŸ”Ή (1) Coase’s Theorem: Markets and Externalities

Ronald Coase introduced a key idea in institutional economics:

βœ” Markets can solve externalities efficiently if property rights are well-defined and transaction costs are low.
βœ” Government intervention is not always necessary; private negotiations can lead to efficient solutions.

πŸ“Œ Example:

  • If a factory pollutes a river, the affected fishermen and the factory can negotiate a compensation agreement instead of relying on government regulation.

βœ” Criticism:

  • High transaction costs (legal fees, enforcement issues) often prevent private solutions.
  • Unequal bargaining power can favor large firms over individuals.

βœ” Policy Implication:

  • Well-defined property rights and lower transaction costs help markets function better.

πŸ”Ή (2) New Institutional Economics (NIE)

βœ” NIE focuses on how institutions (laws, norms, governance) shape economic behavior.
βœ” It explains why some economies grow faster based on legal frameworks and transaction costs.

πŸ“Œ Example:

  • Countries with strong legal systems and property rights (e.g., UK, USA) tend to have higher economic growth than those with weak institutions.

βœ” Policy Implication:

  • Institutional reforms (anti-corruption laws, contract enforcement) improve economic performance.

4. Other Recent Schools of Thought

πŸ”Ή (1) Behavioral Economics (Kahneman & Thaler)

βœ” Challenges rational choice theory by showing how biases affect decision-making.
βœ” Introduces loss aversion, bounded rationality, and heuristics.

πŸ“Œ Example:

  • People fear losing $10 more than gaining $10, which affects investment behavior.

βœ” Policy Implication:

  • “Nudging” techniques (e.g., default savings enrollment) improve decision-making.

πŸ”Ή (2) Complexity Economics

βœ” Traditional models assume equilibrium, but complexity economics studies evolving, adaptive markets.
βœ” Uses network theory, emergent behavior, and agent-based modeling.

πŸ“Œ Example:

  • Financial crises spread unpredictably due to complex interconnections between banks.

βœ” Policy Implication:

  • Dynamic regulations adapt to changing market structures.

πŸ”Ή (3) Post-Keynesian Economics

βœ” Focuses on financial instability, income distribution, and uncertainty.
βœ” Hyman Minsky’s Financial Instability Hypothesis explains how excessive lending leads to crises.

πŸ“Œ Example:

  • The 2008 financial crisis followed Minsky’s prediction: low-risk lending turned into speculative bubbles.

βœ” Policy Implication:

  • Stronger banking regulations prevent excessive risk-taking.

5. Conclusion

βœ” Social choice theory (Arrow & Sen) explores how societies make collective decisions, but fairness is difficult to achieve.
βœ” Coase’s theorem shows that private solutions to externalities are possible if transaction costs are low.
βœ” New Institutional Economics highlights the role of institutions in economic development.
βœ” Recent schools (behavioral, complexity, and post-Keynesian economics) challenge traditional models and offer insights into real-world economic behavior.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *