FOR SOLVED PREVIOUS PAPERS OF INDIAN ECONOMIC SERVICE KINDLY CONTACT US ON OUR WHATSAPP NUMBER 9009368238

FOR SOLVED PREVIOUS PAPERS OF ISS KINDLY CONTACT US ON OUR WHATSAPP NUMBER 9009368238
FOR BOOK CATALOGUEΒ
CLICK ON WHATSAPP CATALOGUE LINKΒ https://wa.me/c/919009368238
The Phillips Curve and Its Policy Implications
1. Introduction
π The Phillips Curve illustrates the inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment in the short run. It suggests that when inflation is high, unemployment is low, and vice versa.
π Why is it important?
β Helps policymakers understand the trade-off between inflation and unemployment.
β Guides monetary and fiscal policies for economic stability.
β Explains stagflation (when inflation and unemployment rise together).
2. Understanding the Phillips Curve
πΉ The Basic Concept:
In the short run, an increase in aggregate demand (AD) reduces unemployment but raises inflation. Conversely, when AD falls, unemployment rises but inflation decreases.
π Graphical Representation:
- X-axis: Unemployment rate (%)
- Y-axis: Inflation rate (%)
- The curve slopes downward, showing the trade-off.
πΉ Mathematical Representation: Ο=ΟeβΞ²(UβUn)\pi = \pi_e – \beta (U – U_n)
Where:
- Ο\pi = Actual inflation
- Οe\pi_e = Expected inflation
- UU = Actual unemployment
- UnU_n = Natural rate of unemployment
- Ξ²\beta = Sensitivity of inflation to unemployment
π Key Takeaway: Lowering unemployment comes at the cost of higher inflation, and vice versa.
3. The Short-Run vs. Long-Run Phillips Curve
πΉ Short-Run Phillips Curve (SRPC):
β In the short run, a decrease in unemployment leads to higher inflation.
β Governments may exploit this trade-off to boost employment.
πΉ Long-Run Phillips Curve (LRPC):
β Introduced by Milton Friedman and Edmund Phelps.
β Over time, workers adjust their expectations, and the economy returns to the natural rate of unemployment (U_n).
β The long-run Phillips curve is vertical, meaning there is no long-term trade-off between inflation and unemployment.
π Key Implication:
Any attempt to lower unemployment below the natural rate will only lead to higher inflation without reducing unemployment in the long run.
4. Breakdown of the Phillips Curve: Stagflation
π Stagflation (1970s) β High inflation + High unemployment.
β The 1970s oil shocks led to cost-push inflation, increasing both prices and unemployment.
β This contradicted the traditional Phillips Curve, showing that inflation and unemployment could rise together.
β Led to the development of supply-side economics and a focus on controlling inflation through monetary policy.
5. Policy Implications of the Phillips Curve
πΉ 1. Monetary Policy (Central Bank Actions)
β In the short run, central banks lower interest rates to reduce unemployment.
β In the long run, monetary expansion only increases inflation.
β Post-1970s, monetary policy shifted to controlling inflation rather than reducing unemployment.
πΉ 2. Fiscal Policy (Government Spending and Taxation)
β Governments may use expansionary fiscal policies (higher spending, lower taxes) to reduce unemployment.
β However, excessive fiscal expansion leads to higher inflation and public debt.
πΉ 3. Inflation Targeting
β Central banks now focus on keeping inflation low and stable rather than manipulating unemployment.
β Example: U.S. Federal Reserveβs 2% inflation target.
πΉ 4. Structural Reforms
β To reduce the natural rate of unemployment, governments focus on:
- Education and skill development.
- Labor market flexibility.
- Reducing business regulations to boost employment.
6. Conclusion
β The Phillips Curve shows the short-run trade-off between inflation and unemployment.
β In the long run, there is no trade-off, as the economy adjusts to inflation expectations.
β Stagflation (1970s) proved that inflation and unemployment can rise together.
β Modern policy focuses on inflation control rather than artificially reducing unemployment.
