Concept of Nashequilibrium:Indian Economic Service

FOR SOLVED PREVIOUS PAPERS OF INDIAN ECONOMIC SERVICE KINDLY CONTACT US ON OUR WHATSAPP NUMBER 9009368238

FOR SOLVED PREVIOUS PAPERS OF ISS KINDLY CONTACT US ON OUR WHATSAPP NUMBER 9009368238

FOR BOOK CATALOGUE 
CLICK ON WHATSAPP CATALOGUE LINK https://wa.me/c/919009368238

Concept of Nash Equilibrium

1. Introduction

Nash Equilibrium (NE) is a fundamental concept in game theory, introduced by John Nash in 1950. It describes a situation where no player has an incentive to deviate from their chosen strategy, given the strategies of all other players.

🔹 Key Idea: Each player is making the best decision they can, assuming others stick to their strategies.

2. Formal Definition

A Nash Equilibrium is a strategy profile (S1∗,S2∗,…,Sn∗)(S_1^*, S_2^*, …, S_n^*) such that for each player ii: Ui(Si∗,S−i∗)≥Ui(Si,S−i∗)∀SiU_i(S_i^*, S_{-i}^*) \geq U_i(S_i, S_{-i}^*) \quad \forall S_i

where:

  • Si∗S_i^* = Player ii’s equilibrium strategy
  • S−i∗S_{-i}^* = Strategies of all other players
  • Ui(Si,S−i)U_i(S_i, S_{-i}) = Player ii’s payoff

At NE, no player benefits by changing their strategy alone.


3. Examples of Nash Equilibrium

Example 1: Prisoner’s Dilemma

Two criminals are arrested and separately decide to confess (Defect, D) or remain silent (Cooperate, C).

Player 1 / Player 2Cooperate (C)Defect (D)
Cooperate (C)(3,3)(0,5)
Defect (D)(5,0)(1,1)

🔹 Finding Nash Equilibrium:

  • If Player 1 cooperates, Player 2 prefers defect (5 > 3).
  • If Player 1 defects, Player 2 also defects (1 > 0).
  • (D, D) is the Nash Equilibrium because no player benefits by switching alone.

Example 2: Battle of the Sexes

A couple wants to spend time together but prefers different activities.

Husband / WifeOperaFootball
Opera(2,1)(0,0)
Football(0,0)(1,2)

🔹 Finding Nash Equilibria:

  • If Husband chooses Opera, Wife’s best response is Opera (1 > 0).
  • If Husband chooses Football, Wife’s best response is Football (2 > 0).
  • Two Nash Equilibria: (Opera, Opera) and (Football, Football).

This shows coordination problems, where multiple equilibria exist.


Example 3: Coordination Game

Two companies must decide whether to adopt a new technology (A) or stick with the old one (B).

Firm 1 / Firm 2Adopt (A)Old Tech (B)
Adopt (A)(3,3)(0,2)
Old Tech (B)(2,0)(1,1)

🔹 Finding Nash Equilibrium:

  • If Firm 1 adopts (A), Firm 2’s best response is A (3 > 0).
  • If Firm 1 sticks to B, Firm 2’s best response is B (1 > 0).
  • Two Nash Equilibria: (A, A) and (B, B).

This represents network effects, where firms benefit from coordinating choices.


4. Types of Nash Equilibrium

  1. Pure Strategy Nash Equilibrium
    • Players choose one action with certainty.
    • Example: (D, D) in Prisoner’s Dilemma.
  2. Mixed Strategy Nash Equilibrium
    • Players randomize over strategies with certain probabilities.
    • Used when no pure strategy Nash equilibrium exists.

🔹 Example: Rock-Paper-Scissors
No pure strategy NE, but in mixed strategy NE, players choose Rock, Paper, or Scissors with equal probability (1/3, 1/3, 1/3).


5. How to Find Nash Equilibrium?

Method 1: Best Response Analysis

  1. Identify each player’s best response to the opponent’s strategy.
  2. Find where both players’ best responses coincide → This is Nash Equilibrium.

Method 2: Eliminating Dominated Strategies

  1. Eliminate strategies that are always worse (dominated).
  2. Check the remaining strategies for equilibrium.

Method 3: Solving Equations (For mixed strategies)

  • Set up probability equations where each player’s expected payoff is the same.

6. Importance of Nash Equilibrium

  • Used in Economics & Business → Pricing strategies, auctions, firm competition.
  • Political Science → Voting behavior and negotiations.
  • Sports & Military → Game plans and tactical decisions.

7. Limitations of Nash Equilibrium

  • Multiple equilibria → Hard to predict which one will be chosen.
  • Not always socially optimal → In Prisoner’s Dilemma, NE (D, D) is worse than (C, C).
  • Players must be rational → Assumes perfect reasoning, which is unrealistic in real-world behavior.

8. Conclusion

  • Nash Equilibrium occurs when no player has an incentive to deviate alone.
  • Can exist in pure or mixed strategies.
  • Important in real-world decision-making (markets, politics, games).
  • Not always the best outcome for society (e.g., Prisoner’s Dilemma).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *